Sunday, September 11, 2011

andrew doyle. "How to Lie with Maps"

This article left me torn between two reactions: First, view the article as a series of clever tips to be used to "trick" people using map and diagrams; and Second, strive to avoid these techniques as a moral designer. Many valid points are made here surrounding the idea of maps as a powerful form of persuasion. For example, "Concept diagrams have a compelling, mysterious attraction........These maps encourage the viewer to want to see the plan, not to wonder whether it will work." One can't help but take a statement such as this as a "tip" for proposing a project, although this may not have been the author's intention. Landscape Architecture has always been a profession associated with thorough and morally sound decision-making, however, one cannot simply ignore these observations about how maps and diagrams can both support a design, and manipulate how stakeholders interpret your proposal.

2 comments:

Megan Elizabeth Roussel said...

I feel there is nothing wrong with enticing a client with a concept diagram. If it excites the client into picking your design then its our job as Landscape Architects to keep true to what we present and produce a plan that is rational. If we give them an unrealistic idea and cannot follow through that just looks bad on our part.

elizabeth said...

The conceptual diagram should entrigue our clients to see more of the work we produced. It's like having a good title for a book or a movie. That being said, the content will make us or break us. word of a movie's shortcomings get out quickly and poorly written books just disapper from the shelves. our work must entice the client and hold their attention.